|
Equipment News: - Posted 9th July
1998
Poor demand for Tiger Woods
product lines
Associated Press
Portland, Oregon. -
A year ago, no one was predicting lukewarm sales of Tiger Woods
signature products.
But Nike Inc.'s long-awaited
Tiger Woods line has fallen far below par.
Sales of the Tiger
Woods signature shoe, which retails for between $225 and $250, have
been particularly slow.
"It just plain
flat was a total disaster," Jerry Offerdahl, owner of four
Nevada Bob's Discount Golf shops in Oregon, told The Oregonian.
"We're already closing them out."
Retailers blame high
prices, the shoe's offbeat style and Woods's relatively poor performance
on the PGA Tour this year.
"All the Woods
stuff is so gaudy," said Ryan Kleinjan, of Golf America in
Egan, Minn. "It's easy to sell a 13-year-old. But the 40-year-old
lawyer is turned off by it."
The tepid consumer
reaction is a stunning setback for Nike, which thought Woods' appeal
was so universal that he would be the next can't-miss endorser.
Nike signed Woods to
a five-year deal worth almost $40 million when he became a professional
in late 1996. Now some question how effectively Nike has used Woods.
In his rookie year,
Woods was a phenomenon, including a record-smashing win at The Masters.
Wherever he went, PGA Tour ticket sales and television ratings skyrocketed.
Even Nike chairman
Phil Knight, a man not given to hyperbole, predicted Woods would
"change the way people view the game of golf."
Nike made the decision
to go beyond a mere signature shoe and develop an entire Tiger Woods
product line. But the company's designers faced a tricky set of
demographic and style questions.
They could have played
it safe and fashioned a traditional look. But Nike had something
in mind, sources told The Oregonian, more like the fire-engine
red high-tops that Michael Jordan wore onto NBA courts in the mid-1980s.
Depending on who's
doing the talking, the Tiger Woods signature shoe -- the Air Zoom
TW -- is either sleek and elegantly modern or downright ugly.
"The design was
a little radical," Offerdahl said. "It didn't take us
long to realize the shoes looked good on one guy -- Tiger Woods."
"It looks like
a bowling shoe," griped another retailer who asked to remain
anonymous.
A dozen retailers from
California to Minnesota to Delaware agreed that the Tiger line of
footwear has been disappointing. Nike's Tiger Woods apparel line
has done better in some locations. But there, also, some retailers
feel Nike got too aggressive on price by charging $54 and up for
polo shirts.
"The apparel is
real slow," said Darcy Taylor of International Discount Golf
in Modesto, Calif. "It's a lot of money for a little Swoosh."
The company introduced
the Woods line, which includes golf shoes and apparel, in February.
Starting in April, Nike's golf unit was hit by management departures,
which may or may not be related to the performance of the Tiger
Woods products.
Bob Rief, former general
manager of the unit, left the company about two weeks ago. He would
say only that the parting was "amicable." Four other Nike
golf managers left in the last three months.
Until recently, Nike's
big investment in golf looked like a rousing success. The Beaverton
company's golf sales jumped from $35 million four years ago to about
$200 million in the fiscal year that ended May 31.
The lackluster showing
of the Woods line adds to growing questions about the value of athlete
endorsements. Some companies are paring back on their relationships
with athletes in the belief that few are worth the money.
Woods, however, remains
a power to reckon with, said Bob Dorfman, a sports industry expert
with Foote Cone & Belding, a San Francisco ad agency. "I
don't think this is the end of his viability as an endorser,"
he said. "He's a young guy. The reality of golf is, nobody
wins all the time."
Indeed, Woods remains
one of the most popular figures in sports.
Rob Correa, vice president
for programming at CBS Sports, said that in the Nissan Open in March
and the BellSouth Classic in May, two tournaments in which Woods
was in contention on the final day, CBS's ratings were up 31 percent
and 68 percent, respectively, from the year before.
|